djay for iPad

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuQl8T6ZHmE] Are there other djay apps on the iPad?  Sure.  But, I've used this one on the Mac and it is easily one of the best.

Most importantly, to me:

Seamless AirPlay integration (wirelessly transmit your mix to AppleTV or AirPort Express station)

So...imagine this.  The djay can be walking around the house, mixing the music, in realtime, sent straight to the house system wirelessly through AirPlay.

Seems pretty darn cool.

Welp, there goes $19.99 of the coming iTunes gift card money ;-)

-B

All To Us

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdCd7XpS91U&] Precious cornerstone, sure foundation You are faithful to the end We are waiting, on You, Jesus We believe You're all to us

Let the glory of Your name be the passion of the Church Let the righteousness of God be a holy flame that burns Let the saving love of Christ be the measure of our lives We believe You're all to us

Only Son of God sent from Heaven Hope and mercy at the cross You are everything, You're the Promise Jesus, You are all to us

You're all to us You're all to us You're all to us Yes, You are

When this passing world is over We will see You face to face And forever we will worship Jesus, You are all to us

It Is A Sad Pitch-Corrected World

I'd like you to compare and contrast these two videos. Pay special attention to the last clip. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjCLQaTFXx0&]

And... [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DeL3AzkbRk&]

If the last one had been in an American Idol audition, he'd have definitely made TV, and definitely been asked to leave.

Absolutely awful. Millions watch his YouTube channel. When will we begin to study again how to sing in key, on pitch, and with feeling? Seems pretty basic.

-B

Forget You

Glee has a reputation for overproducing recordings of their singers. It usually makes the songs more pleasant to listen to and, honestly, adds to the humor of the show a little bit. Glee is in that area of being believable and not at all at the same time. I you can live in that space happily, you'll really enjoy the show. I guess this week Gwyneth Paltrow is guest appearing.

Many celebrities have guest appeared on the show since its beginning and almost all have sung a solo.

Gwyneth Paltrow sings "Forget You" this week.

The song is great. (I mean I can't publish that I think the text is great, because in its original form, it's highly inappropriate) but the song is catchy and funny.

You may disagree, but I think this recording sucks. Its the worst auto-tune I've heard in a long time. I don't even think this is her voice. Doesn't sound like it. It's so computerized that it is hard to believe that their musical directors let it go. Can she even sing?

Judge for yourself.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XyKVetF2kk&]

-B

Creativity in Worship...and Why We Are Wrong

One of the things that I find myself thinking about a lot (at times, too much) is the actual experience of a worship service. I try my best to attend a variety of services and even participate in as much as possible in many different roles. I think it's because of the incredible amount of emotion that is called forth when people gather together to give praise to God that I am so drawn to it. A good worship service (no matter the style) evokes the emotions in a way that allows God to enter into the worshiper's heart. This is why we place things of the utmost importance (baptism, communion, etc) inside of these services. These times that we get together as a body of Christ are the times when we connect and grow together. They are important.

As I have mentioned several times, I was a child of the "contemporary movement". You know, guitars, keyboards, drums, lights, and gyms instead of sanctuaries.

It was my definition of church.

Because of this, we rehearsed music, dramas, transitions, and the like in order to create an experience that flowed well.

Those of us who still participate in this practice today get accused of making this experience a form of "entertainment". Like going to a movie theater. For a while, I nodded my head and bought into their arguments. I go to school with many of them.

They were, and still are, wrong.

The argument, as I best understand it, has to do with whether or not church should be entertaining. To them, if church is something that you can go to, enjoy, be anonymous, and not have to commit to, something is wrong. And...the argument is that this new form of worship enables this attitude toward worship and church. It was a fair argument because of the naming of the services. My home church growing up called the service, the "Seeker Service". The name implied that the real Christians, those no longer "seeking", went to another service. As if us Christians aren't always seeking. This implication wasn't the intention though. To outsiders, it may have seemed so.

The other half of the argument was the stupid part. Whether or not they admitted it, they just didn't like this form of worship. So the whole "holier than thou" mindset was a good way to argue against it instead of admitting that it worked.

I sang with the Duke Divinity Gospel choir the other day.

I have sung in worship services since before I can remember. I have led worship for big groups, small groups, in contemporary style, and sung in choirs in traditional services. I have even lead hymns from the guitar.

But I have never really sung in the tradition of the African American Church. One of the things that I noticed was the flow of the service. We sang our songs and the congregation followed along as well as they could. The songs went on for a long time, and involved both the choir and directors interacting with one another. The lead soloist lead us through "Sanctuary" and used techniques to interact with the congregation so that they were "along for the ride". It was awesome.

My realization: the service was truly creative. One of the songs we sang had two parts. The director lead us through it, showing us what to sing, when. There was no sort of "Verse, Chorus" outline prior to the service. It required him to interact with us and us with him. It required him to interact with the congregation.

It required creation to happen.

My belief is that God created us to be creative and I TRULY think that he is OFFENDED when we don't use those talents and gifts inside of our worship services.

Many advocates of traditional worship would argue that their organist is creative. He or she probably is. Many of them would argue that those who write the music for their services is creative. He or she probably is. Many of them would argue that their pastor is very creative. And then their friend sitting next to them (also an advocate) would elbow them in the side because they know that it isn't true.

But in that argument, they would argue against being even more creative in a contemporary setting. Why? Because they don't like it, it makes them uncomfortable, or it's hurting the attendance of their services.

Today I was reminded of what creativity in worship can include. These are pictures from a man who calls himself a "worship VJ" and uses software from Renewed Vision (primarily PropPresenter and ProVideoPlayer) to portray an immersive experience behind the musicians that are leading in worship. You can follow him on twitter at @worshipvj or his site at worshipvj.com

I think that this use of technology and creativity only adds to an experience that helps to connect those who participate, to God.

Lots of people disagree with me.

Again, I believe them to be wrong. I think God rejoices when we use the gifts he has given us to praise him in new ways.

If, somehow, this requires that the lights to have to come down, and that techniques that we used to only see either in movies or theaters have to be used, so be it. This is church. We should be incorporating the brilliance of God's creation in our ongoings before anyone else. And yet we don't. Because we are concerned about tradition.

And because we are wrong.

Let's rejoice in the variety of worship forms. Let's rejoice in creativity no matter where is appears. Let's rejoice in what God is doing in our churches, no matter their "style", and invite others to partake and experience it as well.

-B

**Apologies to those who got the preprocessed notification of this via email. My fat fingers accidentally hit the Publish button and there was no going back**

On Leading in Worship

I do a lot of thinking on this topic, so please excuse the assortment of thoughts. Worship is an interesting thing in today's culture.

It has changed so much in so many American churches that it hardly resembles anything close to the traditions of old. Many churches continue to use a traditional style, but even this "traditional" style has been changed so much that those who have now spent their entire lives without this style (and it is now entirely possible to have worshipped your entire life and avoid this) are immediately turned off by the liturgies practiced in many congregations.

Many churches around the world were early in this adoption of new forms of worship and many of the American churches followed suit by more or less copying everything that was being deemed as "successful" around the globe. In short, if a church was doing something innovative, new, refreshing, etc...and more people were flocking to their services, something must be going right...and we should enact some of the same principles in our weekly services. It seemed like a fail safe plan.

Churches like WillowCreek in Chicago were instrumental in forming this new "contemporary" worship style by incorporating new energetic music, dramatizations, new orders of worship, and hosting summits and workshops to discuss effective methods of leading others in these times of worship. These services required a bit of production to pull off in a way that would be seen as acceptable and therefore required a bit of training. For a small fee, WillowCreek was happy to provide such training.

I strongly believe that the beginning of this lied in the music development. This is where I begin today.

For years, the Protestant churches have compiled songs written (over hundreds of years) for their churches to use in worship services. They compiled these in the best know compilation technology of their time, books. We often refer to them as hymnals. Hymnals are great. They provide the texts of songs, melody lines, and even four part harmonies in most cases to the songs that churches might use on a weekly basis. What did this do for the church? It made it that much easier to do two things: it allowed a mediocre pianist or organist to accompany the congregational singing. Secondly, it allowed a mediocre choir or choir director to put together music that didn't...suck. This is huge. It made the singing of songs accessible to so many in so many churches. It was such a good idea that the UM church followed up by releasing more of an ecumenical offering called The Faith We Sing . The hymnal seemed to be a good thing, churches were getting their monies out of them, but new songs were on the horizon. TFWS made sense.

Enter modern worship. Guitars instead of organs. Keyboards instead of pianos. Drums and clapping instead of... Praise teams instead of choirs. Sound systems instead of... Worship leaders instead of choir directors.

The songs, at first, were easy. Three or four chords, four or eight lines, five hours long (I stole this from Jason Byassee's sermon a few weeks back). The guitars were by far easier to play than organs. The songs had somewhat simpler melodies and texts so they were easier to sing and comprehend. And they were fun, so more people thought it was nice and enjoyed it. Church was opened up to many more. It made it , more accessible, if you will.

The Leadership was key. Interaction with the congregation was essential. "Selling" a song became a used term. Leadership was key.

In doing this, we opened the door to many who thought that worshipping God was boring. We opened the door to those who had felt outcast from the liturgical forms of worship prior. We made worship feel more like a rock concert instead of an orchestral concert where people in today's culture felt like they were part of the action, rather than just an observer. After all, if you go to worship God, don't you desire to feel like you are part of what is going on?

The leadership could make you feel like you were a part of something great and that there were songs that could help you express that. And they were about to teach one to you. In feeling like you were a part of something great, you felt acceptance. Churches grew. MegaChurches didn't feel that mega because those leading in the music could make it feel so welcoming.

For those who opened their minds to it, it was awesome.

But the music was accessible. Accessibility means a couple of things: it can be had by more than ever before, and it is much easier to cheapen and destroy.

Because it WAS so easy to lead, more people who weren't necessarily gifted in leading began leading.

And all the things that made it so great, came crashing down.

The songs weren't as great because all of a sudden anyone could write one. The thought put into writing was lost. Phrases were reused. Chord progressions were overused. It became very easy to become very sick of a certain song (Lord, I Lift Your Name on High)

The interaction between the leadership and the congregation was lost because people who weren't naturally gifted at leading others in worship were doing so and felt awkward. With the advent of the iPod and recordings, people began to copy what other worship leaders (namely those who wrote the songs) said to THEIR congregations on THAT morning rather than what was relevant to the current congregation this morning.

The leadership in worship was lost.

Sure, there were those who lead the songs. But there is a huge difference between a "song leader" and "worship leader". Arguably, there became a huge difference between a "worship leader" and a "leader of worship".

Want proof? I can't tell you how many times I have heard this phrase leave a person's mouth(one that is a strong supporter of contemporary worship): "I'd rather go to a great traditional worship service than a bad contemporary service."

A couple friends of Allison's and mine went with us (or us with them) to an acapella concert last week. It was fun. They did a nice job. But, the one criticism that we came away with is that (because of lack stage presence and assuredly...planning) they often made the audience feel awkward when it came to things such a transitions between songs, etc.

How many times have you been in a contemporary, or for that matter traditional service, and felt awkward because those leading...didn't know what they were doing? Sure, being uncomfortable in worship can be a good thing. If it is used for stretching, not because you don't have your stuff together.

Contemporary worship, because of its ease of accessibility, has allowed for more people to lead worship than should.

Perhaps we have forgotten that leading worship requires a few essential things in order to be productive to a faith journey. Talent in the gifts that God has blessed you with, and a calling so that you know that THIS is why God has placed you here.

As I struggle with my "calling" in the best role that I could play here on earth, I often question whether I am hesitant to enter the contemporary worship music scene as a leader because of the incredible amount of people who are pursuing that because they thought it would be fun. It's a hard world to enter and I often question whether I am suited for it.

However, with a little trust in what God is doing in the world and in the church, I am continually reminded of the gifts and talents that God has placed on my life and how those might be used to further worship in congregations everywhere.

Worship via music is essential, and I think that it is a huge opportunity for the church to grow. Surely, this is what I am supposed to be doing.

I just hope that I am right.

Thanks for reading.

-B

Matisyahu and PS22

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maVIZ30GPGU&] just a few comments though:

Is it just me or is the reggae sense kind of lost in this performance even more than it already is in the song to begin with?

The words(because of the difficulty of melody and rhythm) are lost in a mush.

Matisyahu is a sick beatboxer.

What is going through the girl's head who is singing the solo? She is singing the song WITH THE ARTIST.

Where is Akon?

Ha.  Great work boys and girls.

-B

Come In Pluto

In 2006, not long after the IAU took away Pluto from our planetary system, Jordan Stout, Andrew Norton, and myself wrote a song. A cry to Pluto if you will.

Andrew wrote the poetry, I saw it on the Facebook group and wrote this plea. We went on to write an entire album. Perhaps we will sell them on iTunes someday.

Lyrics will be below the video:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgMl9nGIWKc]

To you it may not seem that bad

But a life without Pluto is very sad

What did he ever do that was so wrong?

That is why I will forever sing my song...

 

Come in Pluto, can you hear my cry?

I'll fight for you until the day I die

And, come in Pluto no we won't let go

A dwarf planet it still a planet, no?

 

So don't just sit back while this goes on

Stand up and be part of the revolution

Bring pluto back to where he belongs

Together we can right this terrible wrong.

 

Come in Pluto, can you hear my cry?

I'll fight for you until the day I die

And, come in Pluto no we won't let go

A dwarf planet it still a planet, no?

A dwarf planet is still a planet, yes.

-B

The Unfortunate Situation That Is Taylor Swift's Singing

Look, I didn't watch the VMA's last night. I was too busy doing school work.  In fact, I forgot all about it.

I happened to get tipped off by Twitter that Kanye was ending the show.  I figured that because of last year, this might be interesting.

It was terrible.  Kanye didn't apologize, he "toasted" his poor judgement in a way of saying, "Everyone is like this a bit..."

Whatever.

But, I went back this morning to find Taylor Swift's performance.  You can watch it below.  Hurry up before Viacom pulls it down. You may have to click through as YouTube has tried to disable the embedding of it.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU04bgrL1_E&hd=1]

Everyone commented just like they do every time she sings live. She's just not a good singer.

There are a few things that play here.

Anyone who has either sung (live) into a microphone that is recorded and listened back later knows that there is no way to make the sound sound like it did live.  For those of you willing to argue about live concerts recorded professionally, YES, they sound good.  But they don't sound exactly like they did live.  They're close...but no quite there.

If you've ever watched a live concert on television, you know this to be the case too.  Every singer sounds a little off. A little out of tune, a little under supported.

Taylor is certainly not an exception to this.

She's young. She's 20.

She sings on tour quite a bit. (This is rough on your voice)

She's mainly a songwriter.

The instruments and sound in the room are loud.

She has in ear monitors that essentially plug her ears and feed her what she needs.

And here's my theory: She's awkward.

Watch her on stage.  She's very pretty, but she's a tall lanky girl, who just seems out of place at times on stage. Many of us who primarily play an instrument and sing often feel that way when we are without an instrument and just a microphone.

Something about all this tells me that she may be personally aware of this. And...because of this, she is less confident.  In watching the clip several times back, I seem to think that this affects the way she sings. Without this confidence, she doesn't have the breath support  to back up some of the phrases she writes.

Nor the range.

Moving along with that theory, she doesn't have the control that many other singers her age have. Listen to Hayley Williams. She gets that control through confidence and breath support control.

I commented on Facebook earlier today that she ought to sing with some sort of pitch correction. After all, you'd be hard pressed to find a pop artist these days that doesn't sing with some effects and pitch control. It's simply a necessity in those situations. Sometimes in live tv performances, those effects are fed to the TV.  Sometimes they're not. I guarantee that you know which ones are which.

The underlying reason that Taylor's performances are not bearable is because the entire song is sung under pitch. Even someone who might be considered "tone deaf" knows when they hear bad singing.

Which leads to my last conclusion, she just doesn't have a very good ear. My guess is that the record company (rightly) picked her up because she was a phenomenal country/pop song writer and she was sellable.  Nothing better than a young, pretty, blonde girl who writes songs (and catchy ones at that) about all the guys that screwed with her. Don't cross Taylor or she'll write a song about you. However, she's not a singer. She's not terrible...we've all heard much worse...but she's not great. Unfortunately for her, that's a large part of being an artist. Musical artists get called on to sing at events live. So you have to be good. People have to enjoy listening to you sing. We just don't with her.

Taylor is great.  She's a better song writer than I'll ever be.

She's got a great heart, as evidenced by the song that she wrote for Kanye and about the experience.

She's got a great story and has only more to look forward to.

She has kept to being a good girl, in a world full of young stars who aren't.

But she can't sing.

She doesn't have the breath support.  She doesn't have the confidence. She doesn't have the ear.  She doesn't have the control.

These are all things that singers consider good and desirable qualities.

Most listeners desire for the artist to posses them as well.

Here's to hoping it gets better.

-B

UPDATE: You can also find the performance here

Lyrics to the song are below:

I guess you really did it this time Left yourself in your warpath Lost your balance on a tightrope Lost your mind tryin’ to get it back

Wasn’t it easier in your lunchbox days? Always a bigger bed to crawl into Wasn’t it beautiful when you believed in everything? And everybody believed in you?

It’s all right, just wait and see Your string of lights is still bright to me Oh, who you are is not where you’ve been You’re still an innocent You’re still an innocent

There’s some things you can’t speak of But tonight you’ll live it all again You wouldn’t be shattered on the floor now If only you would sing what you know now then

Wasn’t it easier in your firefly-catchin’ days? And everything out of reach, someone bigger brought down to you Wasn’t it beautiful runnin’ wild ’til you fell asleep? Before the monsters caught up to you?

It’s all right, just wait and see Your string of lights is still bright to me Oh, who you are is not where you’ve been You’re still an innocent

It’s okay, life is a tough crowd 32, and still growin’ up now Who you are is not what you did You’re still an innocent

Time turns flames to embers You’ll have new Septembers Every one of us has messed up too

Lives change like the weather I hope you remember Today is never to late to Be brand new

It’s all right, just wait and see Your string of lights are still bright to me Oh, who you are is not where you’ve been You’re still an innocent

It’s okay, life is a tough crowd 32, and still growin’ up now Who you are is not what you did You’re still an innocent

PS22 Chorus

One day in Chorale at Florida Southern, a new tenor sat next to me.  His name was Andrew Canlon. Some of you FSCites may have heard him play at Beyond and may have seen "O'Canlon"(his band) play before.

He was good.

Turned out, his old music teacher was a chorus teacher at PS22 in New York City.

Inner city education has always been of interest to me. Probably has something to do with the emotion of fighting the bad parts of our culture.

Coincidently, I had been watching videos of PS22 on YouTube. They've been featured on NiteLine, Oprah, Good Morning America, not to mention that Lady Gaga, Beyonce, Tori Amos, and Ashton Kutcher have been huge supporters.

They've done some cool 9/11 stuff as well.

You can see them rehearsing his song "Valor" with an intro from the teacher:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KHdEYgq7Tg]

Though many musicians and music teachers fight against using pop culture and musical influences to teach youth, I've always viewed it as an effective means of producing a good product. Plus it pays homage to what is happening in our world.

It is rare that you see kids this young singing such music with such passion. Forget the technicalities of musicianship for now, this is good work.

You can see Andrew singing his song with the PS22 choir here:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH7NtUaze3I]

Take some time and watch their videos, many of them, on YouTube.

I hadn't watched them in some time but I was reminded today of just how good some of the clips are.

-B